<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Internet in Panama</title>
		<description>Comments for Internet in Panama at http://www.thepanamareport.com , comment 1 to 6 out of 6 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.thepanamareport.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:32:27 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Expensive is a relative term</title>
			<link>http://www.thepanamareport.com/information/living/internet-in-panama.html#comment-2272</link>
			<description>I have been using PaNetMa for my Internet for almost 2 years now.  Before that, I was for several years with Cable &amp; Wireless (2002-2009), and before that, with Cable Onda (in 2001-2002).  The thing with any of those companies is that, whenever you have an issue with your service, it's a pain to first deal with the worthless guys at the call center, and then have to wait days for a technician to arrive and check the issue.  For me, that's a huge problem because Internet is a necessary tool in my office (and home), not a luxury.  So, when I started to hear the good reviews of PaNetMa in 2009, I gave them a try, and I must say there's no promotion of either Cable Onda or C&amp;W that would have me switch bak, not even if they gave me the service for free.  PaNetMa's service is truly reliable as I have not had with any of the other companies, and whenever you run into an issue, you call the guys and they get into the situation a.s.a.p., and the problem takes minutes or, in the worst case, hours to be solved, not days or weeks.  For me, that's much more important than saving a few bucks per month.  So, although PaNetMa's service is not cheap, in the end it's more expensive for me to have a cheap but unreliable service.  After all, as they say, you get what you pay for.  I recommend PaNetMa with my eyes closed. - Jaime</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 13:55:51 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>not to mention</title>
			<link>http://www.thepanamareport.com/information/living/internet-in-panama.html#comment-2070</link>
			<description>who in their right mind wouldn't rather pay a little more for a quality product? cable and wireless are idiots when it comes to responding to internet issues. the extra money is worth not waiting alone. - Miguel Estrada</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 05:02:32 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>actually, PaNETma costs less</title>
			<link>http://www.thepanamareport.com/information/living/internet-in-panama.html#comment-2069</link>
			<description>rock, if you consider value, PaNETma costs less than C&amp;W or Cable Onda.

Here is a basic analogy.
C&amp;W sells 5 cookies for $5.
PaNETma sells 15 better tasting cookies for $8. - RK</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 03:20:22 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Panetma</title>
			<link>http://www.thepanamareport.com/information/living/internet-in-panama.html#comment-2065</link>
			<description>But Panetma is roughly TWICE the cost of C&amp;W or Cableonda, no? - rock</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 13:51:34 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Panetma is the answer</title>
			<link>http://www.thepanamareport.com/information/living/internet-in-panama.html#comment-2005</link>
			<description>You found internet Valhalla in Panama. Tried them all. Only Panetma is a true internet provider anything close to gringo standard. Congrats and lets all spread the word. - Mike B</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 08:28:22 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Panama-aah.blogspot.com</title>
			<link>http://www.thepanamareport.com/information/living/internet-in-panama.html#comment-1987</link>
			<description>I haven't had any problems with our internet while in Panama. Only once and that's much less then the problems I had living in Boston. So that's good I guess. :o) - Psych Sykes</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:26:15 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

